Below are the TOP AI Humanizers that Pass Originality 3.0 and Turnitin recent Updates
Stealth GPT
🚨 Most Aggressive
BUY IF..
✅ You want a 99% chance of bypassing Originality and Turnitin at all costs
DON’T BUY IF..
❌ Grammar, syntax, and style are important to you
Undetectable ai
🚨 Most Versatile
BUY IF..
✅ If you write & submit both articles and essays
DON’T BUY IF..
❌ You need 100% guaranteed results and 50-60% human score is low for you
Stealth Writer
🚨 Best Readability
BUY IF..
✅ Readability & keeping the original meaning is the highest priority
DON’T BUY IF..
❌ You’d rather have a 100% result even if the quality suffers
Welcome to the digital showdown where 10 AI Models were put to the test against the keen eyes of Turnitin and Originality.
I’m Vlad Ivanov from WordsAtScale, and we’ve cracked the code on which AIs can craft essays that fly under the radar. Curious about the ai models detected by Turnitin and Originality?
Stay tuned, because we’re diving deep into the world of AI detection. For more insights, check out our WordsAtScale channel.
Table of contents
Originality Detection Results
| AI Model | Plain Prompt Originality Score | Special Prompt Originality Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5 | 0% | 0% | Failed to pass Originality with both prompts. |
| GPT-4 | 2% | 71% | Significant improvement with the special prompt. |
| OpenAI Playground | N/A | 100% | Perfect score with special settings and prompt. |
| Claude-2 | 99% | 100% | Excellent performance with both prompts. |
| Gemini Pro | 0% | 0% | Did not pass Originality. |
| Mixtral-8x7B | 0% | 0% | Did not pass Originality. |
| Qwen | 0% | 0% | Did not pass Originality. |
| Llama-2-70b | 0% | 0% | Did not pass Originality. |
| Solar | 0% | 0% | Did not pass Originality. |
| Falcon | 0% | 0% | Did not pass Originality. |
Turnitin Detection Results
| AI Model | Special Prompt AI Score | Mega Prompt AI Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4 (ChatGPT) | 0% (100% human) | 0% (100% human) | Both prompts resulted in essays undetected by Turnitin. |
| GPT-4 1106 (OpenAI Playground) | 11% AI | 0% (100% human) | The free prompt scored within the safe zone; the mega prompt was undetected. |
| Claude-2 | 0% (100% human) | 0% (100% human) | Consistently undetected by Turnitin with both prompts. |
These tables provide a clear and concise overview of how each AI model performed in the experiments. They can be used as a reference for anyone interested in understanding which AI models are more likely to produce content that is considered original by detection tools like Originality and Turnitin.
The Experiment
Our journey begins with a simple yet ambitious goal: to test various AI models and see if they can pass the originality test. We’re not just talking about any models; we’re looking at the big guns like GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and a few other contenders. The plan? To see if they can produce essays that are deemed original by detection tools.
The AI Contenders
Here’s a quick rundown of the models we put to the test:
- GPT-3.5
- GPT-4
- OpenAI Playground
- Claude-2
- Gemini Pro
- Mixtral-8x7B
- Qwen
- Llama-2-70b
- Solar
- Falcon
Each of these models was given a chance to shine, tasked with writing a 2000-word essay on reimagining history. Sounds like a tough assignment, right? Well, let’s see how they fared.
The Results
Originality’s Verdict
Originality is like that strict teacher who doesn’t let anything slip by. So, when we ran our essays through its system, here’s what we got:
- GPT-3.5: A big fat 0% original. Ouch!
- GPT-4: With a plain prompt, it scored a measly 2% original. But hold on! When we used a special prompt, it jumped to an impressive 71% original. Talk about a comeback!
- OpenAI Playground: With some special settings and the right prompt, it nailed a perfect 100% original score. A round of applause, please!
- Claude-2: This model was like the cool kid in class, scoring 99% original with a plain prompt and a perfect 100% with the special prompt.
As for the others, let’s just say they didn’t make the honor roll this time around.
Turnitin’s Challenge
Turnitin is the big boss when it comes to detection, and it’s not easily fooled. We took our top performers and put them to the ultimate test. Here’s the scoop:
- GPT-4: With the special prompt, it achieved a 0% AI score on Turnitin. That’s a home run!
- OpenAI Playground: It scored an 11% AI score with the free prompt, which is still within the safe zone. But with the mega prompt, it hit the jackpot with 0%.
- Claude-2: Consistent as ever, it scored 0% with both the free and paid prompts.
What Does This Mean for You?
If you’re looking to use AI for writing and want to stay on the good side of originality checks, here’s the deal:
- GPT-4 and OpenAI Playground are your best bets, especially with the right prompts and settings.
- Claude-2 is a reliable buddy that won’t let you down.
- The other models? They might need a bit more training before they can dodge the detection radars.
Conclusion and final thoughts 💭
GPT-4 and OpenAI Playground have demonstrated the ability to produce content that can pass stringent originality tests, particularly with carefully crafted prompts. Claude-2 also shows consistent performance in evading detection by tools like Originality and Turnitin. However, other AI models, including GPT-3.5, Gemini Pro, Mixtral-8x7B, Qwen, Llama-2-70b, Solar, and Falcon, currently lack the sophistication required to create content that is deemed original by these detection systems.
